|
Ventilation of the patient in respiratory arrest is a delicate
balance between what the patient requires and what the rescuer
can provide. Balancing the ventilation parameters (to reinstate
the patient's physiology to the best possible condition)
is essential. Keeping the patient in equilibrium during the "on-scene" and
transport phases of the resuscitation offers the patient
the best possible chance of survival. It can also provide
the emergency room staff the precious edge that means the
difference between success and failure in resuscitation.
The equipment used, whether it is a simple face shield type device or bag-valve-mask
resuscitator is only an adjunct to the skill and care of the rescuer and in
many cases the equipment may detract from the rescuer's ability to perform
successful ventilation.
The chaotic nature of the emergency can also distract the rescuer from the
task at hand if the equipment being used is complicated or requires multiple
decision making processes in order to set up the ventilation parameters.
Frequency of Ventilation, Tidal Volume, Inspiratory Time and Expiratory time
are all factors that relate to good ventilation. All are important (and inter-dependent)
and it is necessary to understand the relationships between these factors and
how an imbalance in these relationships can seriously affect the patient's
crucial outcome.
Ventilation parameters for "average patients" have been well documented
in standard texts on Respiratory Physiology. These guidelines can be used very
successfully for the emergency treatment of respiratory and/or cardiac arrest.
This can be achieved without having to resort to complex ventilation set ups
that take a considerable amount of time, which may not be practical during
the breathing emergency, especially if the patient has also suffered severe
trauma which requires immediate action. Under these circumstances the less
the rescuer has to do to provide good ventilation, the better the patient will
be ventilated and less stress will be placed on the rescuer.
The American Heart Association Guidelines for Resuscitation' clearly indicate
that slow respiratory times and low flowrates reduce the risk of gastric distension
while ensuring good oxygen diffusion in the blood stream by allowing adequate
time for alveolar filling and gas exchange. The need for adequate exhalation
times is also very important if CO2 is to be successfully diffused
out of the blood.
In normal patients CO2 diffuses across the alveolar-capillary membrane
20 times faster than oxygen. In the patient in cardiac arrest a number of factors
significantly affect this diffusion and increase the need for longer expiratory
times.
Reduced lung compliance due to interstitial tissue edema, reduced cardiac output
and a corresponding decrease in circulatory flow, all add to the reduction
in the body's ability to adequately blow off CO2. If adequate expiratory
time is not provided then CO2 will build up in the system and hypercarbia
(increased CO2 levels) will quickly follow hypoxia.
Although inspired oxygen is forced in under pressure to fill the alveoli, expiration
takes place primarily through the natural fall of the chest (and to some extent
by the chest compressions provided by the rescuer during CPR)
This may not provide for complete emptying of the lungs during each expiratory
phase. Therefore, for full gas exchange to have the opportunity to take place,
the expiratory time must be significantly longer than the inspiratory time.
The recommendation for expiratory time is that it should be twice the time
interval of the corresponding inspiratory time thus creating an Inspiratory/Expiratory
(1:E) ratio of 1:2.
This cannot be achieved using manually triggered devices or operator powered
devices (such as a pocket mask or B-V-M). This is due to the fact that the
timing of two thirds of a breath to generate on acceptable "E" time
(even when a slow rate of 12 breaths per minute is used) is impossible to accurately
determine and maintain over time, The AHA are now recommending' the use of "Automatic
Transport Ventilators" to accomplish successful, accurate and effective
ventilation. These devices have been available for many years but have seen
little use in the market for three main reasons:
- (1) They can be as much as ten times the cost when compared
to a reusable B-V-M.
- (2) They are seen as being complicated to operate and
only suitable for use by the most highly trained rescue
personnel.
- (3) These automatic devices require a pressurized oxygen
supply. While the increased cost of these devices cannot
be denied, the actual is much less when the effectiveness
of the device and the results they can achieve is considered.
The complexity of operation of ATV's is dependent on the
product used. There are many devices now available that have
a single control for the setting of both volume and
ventilation frequency base on normal physiological rates
and volumes. This simplifies the decision making process,
and indeed makes the judgement of delivered tidal volume
and frequency of ventilation far more simple than even mouth-to-mouth.
The newer devices available also accurately control the 1:E ratio to the
recommended 1:2 setting and offer low flowrates to improve gas diffusion
and significantly reduce gastric distension and subsequent aspiration of stomach
contents (a common occurrence with B-V-Ms). This is because the esophageal
sphincter opening pressure is not reached when low flowrates are used in normal,
patent, airways.
Other features that some of these devices can offer are Demand Breathing of
100% oxygen for the spontaneously breathing patient and Manual Ventilation
for the pre-oxygenation of patients with controlled low flowrates prior to
intubation or suctioning.
If the AHA1 guidelines are followed and 100% oxygen is used to ventilate
patients in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest (as has been done for years with
B-V-Ms), the argument over the need for a supply of oxygen is not wasted, as
it is with reservoir/accumulator systems on B-V-Ms which require a continual
supply of high flow oxygen to fill the reservoir/accumulator, part of which
is vented to atmosphere. The simplicity of operation and accuracy of ventilation
parameters with improved ventilation techniques, make these products ideal
for all levels of rescuer.
They eliminate many time consuming decision making processes and improve overall
gas exchange and level of oxygenation.
Conclusion
ATVs offer superior ventilation. They reduce the time consuming
decision making process for the rescuer to a minimum and
allow the rescuer to concentrate on the patient rather than
the equipment. When choosing your resuscitation equipment
always try to create the right balance between price and
cost so that the scales will always swing in favour of your
patient.
References
1. A.H.A. Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiac Care, J.A.M.A. Oct. 28, 1992:2171-2295
|